Baby Blues
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Baby Blues

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,321

    Default Baby Blues

    Okay, give it to me! I can take it!! This area has been pretty quiet the last week or so, so I thought I'd stick my neck out there!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Palmyra, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    9,214

    Default Background

    Hi Heather;

    I'll look closer tomorrow. For now, the background is too strong. If you want the eyes to be the focal point, you don't want a blue background. You want one close to the image colors.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,321

    Default

    I knew I was in trouble when I saw 34 views and only 1 response :-)




    It 'pops' more before I post it... it loses something in the translation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,321

    Default

    I'll try this one, too



    (yes, I know, bordering on obsessive)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    1,583

    Default

    Hi Heather -

    If it were me, I wouldn't use any of those colors... the pink makes the baby look ruddy, and the tan makes her (him?) look pallid. Maybe try one that is the lighter white of the background? I can never tell with the border colors until I play around with them all for a while.

    Pretty baby, btw!

    Liz

    ["Bordering on obsessive"? No pun intended, eh? ]
    Liz Vance, Cr. Photog, CPP
    oh baby photography
    bellies. babies. beautiful.
    www.ohbabyphoto.com

    A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there--even if you put them all end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity. - Robert Doisneau

  6. #6

    Default

    I don't want to be intrusive here, but perhaps a solid background isn't appropriate on this. Perhaps a cropped portion of the background would look better.

    A smaller stroke might be better, but this may give a better idea as to what I mean. YOMV. Just my insight for what it's worth!
    Attached Images Attached Images

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    1,583

    Default

    Yes! I like that a lot.
    Liz Vance, Cr. Photog, CPP
    oh baby photography
    bellies. babies. beautiful.
    www.ohbabyphoto.com

    A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there--even if you put them all end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity. - Robert Doisneau

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    North Platte, NE
    Posts
    4,986

    Default

    Heather - This is a beautiful image of a cute baby and I am sure her Mom is pleased. For competition it has several issues that will probably keep it out of the merit catergory. The first that it is broad lighting. Not to be condescending - but I don't know if you are familar with that term or not. What it means is the light is striking the broadest side of the face as presented to camera. Next - it is uncomfortable tight cropping - almost like she is in a box. You need a lot more room around her - especially with small children and babies - to keep them looking small. It is good that you are keeping the image small in the presentation - so that she is not larger than life size - but IMO that's not enough to compensate for the tight crop.
    Lastly - while this is a very nice image - it is a common subject treated in a fairly comman manner. There is nothing unusual about the pose, camera angle, expression, presentation etc to create impact.
    I feel the image would score in the 75-77 range- an above average score. If you will be saitisfied with that - then by all means go ahead with the image. If you are only going to be happy with a merit - perhaps you might want to select a different image.
    Keith A. Howe
    M.Photog.,M.Artist, Cr.,D.F.Ph.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Palmyra, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    9,214

    Default Better but

    Hi Heather;

    Your new versions are much better. I agree with everything Keith said. And ... the baby is WAY too big in the presentation. "Kids Need Room to Grow" in a portrait. You will get rewarded with higher scores on images where the size of the child, in the presentation, makes them look tiny and young. So lots of space is a good thing.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,321

    Default

    Once again, very good feedback, guys. I seem to be caught in this vicious circle where I can create something that mom loves, but can't create a merit image - and I really need to change that!!!! Grr! I've got a ton of 78's and 79's in a case behind me and I'm just not okay with that. Maybe it's time to go back to portrait lighting school, because, clearly, I'm doing what's easy and not what's great.

    Keith - you weren't condesending! Unfortunately, I DO know what broad lighting is (which makes it even worse!), and, like I said earlier, I have a tendancy to do what's easy, and not what's great (which is why I'm stuck in a not-quite-merit rut!). Mom loved the image, so of course, I felt good about it, too... but once again, mom's love does not make a judge's love! Oh, and it's funny that you should mention the crop - I had a tough time with that because there is a LOT more room in the original image - but I didn't like the way baby's tummy came up off her chest, so I cropped in tight to focus on her face.

    And, Dave - thank you - I like that background better - I was having a heck of a time with a solid background - I couldn't get anything to look right, but I couldn't a textured one to look right, either!

    Anyone know some really good, top notch, hands-on lighting workshops?

    You know, it's interesting, I can pour through my copies of PPA Showcase and Loan books and look at those images and go "wow... that is BEAUTIFUL" and I know that that is where those images belong. Then, I look at my own (completely biased, of course) and thing, "wow... I really love this image, I wonder how it would do?" I've never gone into a competition thinking I had a dead-on brilliant piece that would wow my judges - maybe that's my underlying issue! (well, that and lighting, of course)

    Signed,
    Yet-another-unmerited-print

    Back to the drawing board!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Live Chat is closed