Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Flagstaff, AZ

    Default possible print comp submission-critique

    Would like to submit these for the international comp, never competed in it before, I know the 12 guidelines, so I am interested in your feedback. thanks!

    copyright kelhibbs photography 2012

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006

    Default Re: possible print comp submission-critique

    I'm going to leave the cc to others with more experience in comp than I and just give you huge kudos for thinking about comp and posting here for cc.

  3. #3

    Default Re: possible print comp submission-critique

    I haven't judged myself, but I have sat and watched close to a dozen competitions so I will just tell you what I see that I have seen judges mark down for.

    The second image has that huge black area, it is nearly half the frame, crop it out, almost all of it, it adds nothing. For that matter, why is the mirror in the background included? What does it add to either the image, or the story it tells?

    The third image the subject is much too small, and she is dead center, typically a no no. Also I have seen people marked down for tilting too much. Why is it tilted? Tilting just to tilt is usually not scored high.

    The first is confusing to me. Is it a portrait, a still life? Is it an image of the girl or the guitar?

    Don't forget that title is everything. I have seen images marked down for confusing titles.

  4. #4

    Default Re: possible print comp submission-critique

    Congrats for having the courage to post work on here. I would advise you to enter competition at your local affiliate so you can get feedback from qualified judges in person. That has always helped me refine my choices for competition. Best of luck!

  5. #5

    Default Re: possible print comp submission-critique

    Gary is right, I learn a lot when I watch and enter my local print comps.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    New Orleans, LA.

    Default Re: possible print comp submission-critique

    I held off on commenting to give others a chance to chime in -

    Rodney pretty much hit all the main points -

    The first one is relatively flat lit and makes you wonder why the guitar was added on the side since it doesn't seem to help to add to the center of interest of the image.

    The second one has just too much black and doesn't say anything to me - maybe if I could see it larger, I might be able to read more into it.

    In the third image, the lighting again seems to be a bit flat, there is no apparent reason for the tilt, and the blurred foreground object is taking out the bottom of her leg on the right hand side making it look like she is hovering with no support.

    Again, it might help if I could see these a bit larger, but however you have them posted, I cannot enlarge them for a better view.
    The best way to gain for yourself is to give OF yourself.
    - - - So get out there and volunteer for something ...

    Rick Massarini, M. Photog., Cr., CPP., F-PPLA
    PPA Affiliate Juror; 97th Recipient PPA Directors Award
    ASP Governor, SW District Rep. & Convention Booth Chair
    PPLA Past President & Fellow

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Chat is closed