Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Default image critique for certification

    I have received some comments on this gallery, and have re-ordered the pictures, deleted two, added two, and re-cropped one.

    Would you mind critiquing this? I have a particular question about the 10th one (labeled cpp-21), as it was critiqued in the certification gallery before I reprocessed it and I'm wondering if it will work, or if the highlights in the background are too bright, or if the cropping is not acceptable.

    I'd love comments on the current gallery!

    Thank you!

    And it might help to put the link in here!
    Last edited by cpp_upload; 02-16-2011 at 01:26 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Rome, Italy

    Default Re: image critique for certification

    Commented. Some I just "thumbed up" if they were good as-is. The comments marked SM are mine.
    STEFF (not StePH)

    Stephanie Millner Cr.Photog., CPP

    main site | destination pets | blog | facebook | fan page

    Ah, to live like the Italians... with extremely little to do.
    12.01.09 - Viva la Roma!

  3. #3

    Default Re: image critique for certification

    Thank you!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Alexandria, LA

    Default Re: image critique for certification

    I have a question regarding lighting position. I have been told not to submit broad lite photos; and photo's that have the front of the face lighted up. So, if you have young thin girls and children; that look there best "broad light." Do you submit the less attractive photo?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    New Orleans, LA.

    Default Re: image critique for certification

    Broad lighting is usually not the most attractive lighting for most people. They have to be really really thin for short light not to work for them. The short light pattern lights the "mask of the face" and is just generally more attractive. Now if you have an emaciated young lady who really needs to gain weight, then I would say that broad lighting might be appropriate, but I would place on my statement of purpose that it was broad lit for the specific purpose of adding weight to this person so that those evaluating the image understand the intention. Just look at my avatar and imagine how I would look with the light coming from the right instead of the left - I would look like I look like in real life - ugh ! Short Light me - Please !!!

    Charleen, I'm happy to see you on the forum. Welcome !!!!
    Last edited by Rick_Massarini; 02-19-2011 at 06:18 AM.
    The best way to gain for yourself is to give OF yourself.
    - - - So get out there and volunteer for something ...

    Rick Massarini, M. Photog., Cr., CPP., F-PPLA
    PPA Affiliate Juror; 97th Recipient PPA Directors Award
    ASP Governor, SW District Rep. & Convention Booth Chair
    PPLA Past President & Fellow

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    North Platte, NE

    Default Re: image critique for certification

    What Rick said.

    I photographed a bride who was anorexic. Not saying that just to describe her, I've known her since she was a baby and she does have anorexia. So we flat lite or broad lite her. But unless you have someone who is that thin, they probably don't look better broad lit, it's probably a case of a better expression or pose and the fact that it is broad lit is just secondary to what is really making it the best image of that person. Remember CPP is about proving a certain level of competance. The reviewers are looking to see if you know how to correctly & technically create a portrait. They aren't looking for creativity or your individual artistic style. So choose examples that show you know the technically correct way to do something. Print competition is where you get rewarded for creativity and uniqueness.

    Keith A. Howe
    M.Photog.,M.Artist, Cr.,D.F.Ph.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Chat is closed